With the increasing number of cooperation projects between Continental Group and the China Automotive Technology and Research Center (referred to as the China Automobile Center), the Continental Group decided to sign a strategic cooperation agreement to strengthen the cooperation between the two parties. Dr. Kang Ruifan, President and CEO of the Continental Group Executive Board, and Zhang Jianwei, Deputy Director of the China Automotive Technology Research Center, participated in the signing ceremony held in Tianjin. The SAIC Center was established in 1985 as a technical support institution for the technical and administrative departments of the industry and national government authorities. It assists the government in carrying out various activities in the automotive industry including standards and technical regulations, product certification testing and quality system certification. Continental Group and China National Automobile Center hope to strengthen their cooperation in automotive safety, environmental protection, energy conservation and other research fields through the signing of strategic cooperation agreements. “China, as the core market of the Continental Group, is constantly maturing, and has shifted from focusing on quantity growth in the past to paying more attention to quality improvement. With the strong support of China Steam Automobile Center, the Continental Group established the Yancheng Test Center in April 2015. This move has greatly enhanced the R&D capabilities of the Continental Group, said Dr. Kang Ruifan, member of the Continental Group Executive Board and chief executive of China. "The signing of the strategic cooperation agreement will strengthen our relationship with China National Automobile Industry Center. In the future, we will work together for the development of China's auto industry." Deputy Director Zhang Jianwei of China National Automobile Industry Center said: “The Continental Group is one of our important partners and has cooperated with each other in many different fields for many years. Without doubt, the signing of the strategic cooperation agreement will enhance mutual communication and understanding and promote cooperation. And development."
Thermoforming is a manufacturing process used to shape plastic sheets into various custom design products. It involves heating a plastic sheet until it becomes pliable, then using a mold or a vacuum to form it into the desired custom shape.
Thermoforming and vacuum forming are both processes used to shape plastic sheets into specific forms. However, there are some differences between the two techniques:
Thermoforming is a versatile process that is widely used in industries such as packaging, automotive, aerospace, and medical. It offers advantages such as cost-effectiveness, quick turnaround times, and the ability to produce complex shapes with high precision.
Custom Thermoforming,Thermoforming Plastic Products,Thermoforming Process,ABS Thermoforming Dongguan Yiyongli Industrial Co.,Ltd. , https://www.dgthermoforming.com
Continental signed strategic cooperation agreement with China Automobile Center
1. Process: In thermoforming, a plastic sheet is heated until it becomes pliable, and then it is pressed against a mold using pressure or a vacuum. Vacuum forming, on the other hand, relies solely on the use of a vacuum to draw the heated plastic sheet onto the mold.
2. Mold complexity: Thermoforming is typically used for more complex shapes and intricate molds, as it allows for greater detail and precision. Vacuum forming, on the other hand, is better suited for simpler shapes and molds that do not require as much detail.
3. Material thickness: Thermoforming is often used for thicker plastic sheets, typically ranging from 0.030 to 0.250 inches in thickness. Vacuum forming is more commonly used for thinner plastic sheets, typically ranging from 0.005 to 0.060 inches in thickness.
4. Production volume: Thermoforming is generally more suitable for high-volume production due to its faster cycle times and ability to handle larger sheets of plastic. Vacuum forming is better suited for low to medium volume production, as it has slower cycle times and is limited by the size of the vacuum forming machine.
5. Cost: Thermoforming typically requires more expensive equipment and molds, making it a more costly process compared to vacuum forming. Vacuum forming, on the other hand, is a more cost-effective option for smaller production runs or prototypes.
Overall, thermoforming is a more advanced and versatile process that offers greater precision and complexity, while vacuum forming is a simpler and more cost-effective option for less complex shapes and smaller production volumes.
Continental Group and China Automotive Industry Center Sign Strategic Cooperation Agreement to Strengthen Cooperation in Safety and Environmental Protection