Since 2015, the United States has constantly waved "double reverse" sticks against China. Recently, the U.S. Department of Commerce finally decided that there were dumping and subsidies for passenger cars and light truck tires imported from China. China’s Ministry of Commerce has expressed strong opposition and believes that the U.S. move violates the rules of the World Trade Organization and the U.S. domestic laws and harms people. It hopes that the U.S. side will handle this case cautiously and avoid disrupting trade and cooperation between related industries in the two countries. Experts pointed out that the United States’ practice of cracking down on Chinese companies and protecting the interests of their own companies is ultimately worth more. China will actively adopt countermeasures and countermeasures to safeguard the principles of free trade and fair competition. Many times encountered "double opposition" during the year The United States has long been eyeing Chinese tires . In response to a complaint from the U.S. Steel Workers Federation and another labor organization, the U.S. Department of Commerce launched an anti-dumping and countervailing ("double reverse") investigation on the aforementioned products imported from China on July 15 last year. In November of last year and January of this year, the U.S. Department of Commerce announced the preliminary results of the "double reaction." On July 27, 2015, the US International Trade Commission will make a final ruling. If the agency also makes an affirmative final ruling, that is to say that such products imported from China will cause substantial damage or threat to the US related industries, the US Department of Commerce will require the customs to formally impose “double reverse†tariffs on related products. In addition to tires, many Chinese products have suffered a "double reaction" in the United States this year. On January 21, 2015, the U.S. International Trade Commission made a final ruling that there was dumping and subsidy behavior for crystalline silicon photovoltaic products imported from mainland China, and there was dumping behavior in such products imported from Taiwan; in April, U.S. domestic companies had Submitted complaint materials on anti-dumping of cold-rolled coils in China; on June 3, six major US steel manufacturers submitted petitions to the U.S. government and an international trade organization, claiming that China and other four economies were unfairly conditioned. The imported steel is causing substantial damage to the U.S. domestic industry and requires the initiation of anti-dumping duties and anti-subsidy tax requests... Misuse of "Double Reverse" Leads to Double Loss Less than six months later, the United States frequently resorted to “double counter†sanctions. On the one hand, it is to protect the interests of local companies and seek support for politician elections. On the other hand, it also uses alternatives before China’s full market economy status may be recognized. The national standard ruled "double reverse". Experts pointed out that under the background of growing economic interdependence between China and the United States and reciprocal trade, the penalties imposed by the United States will lead to double losses. The issue of China's full market economy status has often been raised in anti-dumping investigations. For “non-market economy†countries, the sponsors of anti-dumping cases often quote data from market economy countries (ie, surrogate countries) roughly equivalent to their development levels to calculate benchmark prices, which often results in companies that have been accused of anti-dumping cases from receiving fair treatment. "If the full market economy status of China is determined this year or next year, the United States can no longer find replacement costs. Therefore, we must frequently implement the 'double reversal' on the last bus, otherwise we will expire and become obsolete." MOFCOM International Trade and Economic Cooperation Bai Ming, deputy director of the Institute’s International Market Research Department, analyzed in an interview with this reporter. In fact, the United States has not benefited from its own efforts to suppress Chinese tire products. Bai Ming pointed out that the tire industry between China and the United States is misplaced. Chinese tires mainly occupy the mid-to-low-end market in the United States. Even if they hold Chinese products, other products of the same level in other countries will fill the gap in the US market. High-end US products are still not competitive. . “In addition, the United States has pressure on Chinese products, as well as its intention to exert pressure on the Chinese government, China’s trade policies, and the renminbi. At the time of the election, the United States likes to wave its trade protection sticks and exert pressure on the major trading nation to obtain voters. Support," said Bai Ming. Multi-government enterprises respond In recent years, the "double opposition" has often been used by the United States because of its difficulty in responding to complaints, the superposition of anti-dumping and anti-subsidy tax rates, the vagueness of WTO rules, and the fact that the investigation rulings can actually be manipulated. But now the Chinese government and companies are not discouraged by the unfavorable situation and their ability to respond to complaints is getting higher and higher. According to reports, the “double reverse†case of US container shipments to China that took more than a year has seen a “substantial reversal.†The US International Trade Commission finally rejected the US Department of Commerce’s high anti-dumping and countervailing duties on these products in April this year. The tariff decision. This is a successful case in which few Chinese-funded enterprises have won the case as defenses in recent years. "The Chinese government and enterprises must strive to arguing and unite and actively appeal!" said Bai Ming. It is reported that during the appeal process of the United States’ container anti-dumping case against China, related companies closely cooperated with the Ministry of Commerce of the People's Republic of China, and also cooperated with other enterprises, and sought the support of more than 90% of customers in the United States. China must also increase its counter-measures capability. "You are infiend to me. I am unjust to you. You do not create a good atmosphere. We can only do business in public and counteract you, so that the United States must be cautious before implementing the "double reverse" in China again." White Ming said. Bai Ming pointed out that people should not resort to protest or counter-institution, and they must lose. Actively responding to and responding to countermeasures may also win. In addition, they should take the initiative to attack and do not have to wait until the United States to sue and then counter the system. In this way, the two sides can easily form a dynamic balance, allowing opponents to recognize China's powerful. It is impossible to negotiate unless we can even negotiate with each other. Only by negotiating can the market make this cake bigger and ultimately achieve a win-win situation. Bladeless electric fan column of air cooler Dragon Town Enterprises (Hong Kong) Limited , https://www.dragon-town.com
The U.S. once again pointed to a double loss of tire abuse